Pending resolution, I am annotating the Krivit page on hypothes.is:
With the < button at the top right, comments can be seen. I should finish this tomorrow.
This page has been taken down temporarily to prepare to handle a DMCA request I received through my service provider, shown below, with which Steve Krivit is attempting to prevent this page from being seen.
It is actually a total copy, as it stated at the top, not just parts. That is, it contains the entire original post of his. To comply with my service provider’s rules, I need to either take it down, or file a counter notification. Because the latter has legal implications, I have decided to research the matter, so to allow time, I am taking this down pending. I may pull it back edited, because I do not necessarily need to show the whole post of his. Perhaps I’ll just show the errors. Or maybe I’ll just bring the whole thing back, filing a counter notification. Or I am experimenting with hypothes.is. Which is very, very interesting….
This, however, was not causing him harm, because the post was available for free access anyway, and links were provided to the original. I have written about copyright and Steve Krivit’s habits of quoting entire papers under “fair use,” as well as quoting, very much without permission, private conversations, so this is … ironic. However, I do not know that he has kept any paper up after receiving a DCMA takendown notice, which this is.
Full Name: Steven Krivit
Street Address: 369B 3rd St. 556
City/State/Country: San Rafael, California USA
Phone: 415 2957801
Description of Copyrighted work(s): large sections of my original article have been republished without my permission at this URL
Link or Details of Original: news.newenergytimes.net/2017/01/12/the-selling-of-iter/
Original work(s) attached.
URL of Infringement: http://coldfusioncommunity.net/net-the-selling-of-iter/
Identification of Infringement: multiple original paragraphs from my article news.newenergytimes.net/2017/01/12/the-selling-of-iter/
I have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
Under penalty of perjury, I am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed
The information in this notification is accurate.
I understand that, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who knowingly materially misrepresents that material or activity is infringing may be liable for damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees.
Digital Signature: Steven Krivit
Are we having fun yet?
More will be revealed.