Flagged Revisions installed. Unapproved pages display a Red unchecked notice under the title. Trolls attack here by creating and archiving pages with offensive content. To verify an archived page, check the original URL. Questions about administration? Contact User talk:Abd. Limited privacy on this site, see CFC:Limited privacy

Wikiversity/Cold fusion/History

From CFC
Jump to: navigation, search
Crystal discussion philosophy.png An editor has expressed concern that this article may not fit into the scope of Wikiversity. Do not use this template unless you have read and understand the Wikiversity project proposal.

You may wish to:

  • Move this page to a site where is is more appropriate.
  • Find a school or topic that this article belongs under.
  • Move this page into your userspace.

If a use cannot be found for this page on Wikiversity, then it may be deleted by a custodian after a period of 5 days. It may be deleted immediately if it meets speedy deletion criteria. If the deletion is contested, then please list the page at requests for deletion for discussion instead.

Tagged by This page is under review per recently closed WV:RFD. Please ignore the 5 day deadline above, as the review will take longer than that. Mu301Bot (discusscontribs) 22:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC) (signed on behalf of User:Mu301)
PrirodneNauke.svg Resource type: this resource may consist of Fringe science.

Please sign any comments on this subpage. Feel free to add your own brief comments. If extensive comment is to be made, create a subpage and link to it.


  • Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion. Random House, 1993.
The book is meticulously sourced. Taubes lists 257 people whom he interviewed. Generally, the book has a reputation for being excellent as to the history, not necessarily as to the agenda he had in creating it (to tell a story of scientific delusion). Even though the heat/helium evidence was known long before he closed out his story, he did not mention it (unlike Huizenga). --Abd (discusscontribs) 23:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • John R. Huizenga, Cold fusion: the scientific fiasco of the century, (second edition) Oxford University Press, 1993.
Covers a great deal of the early history. Huizenga was the co-chair of the U.S. Department of Energy ERAB panel that reviewed cold fusion (quite prematurely, in a rush) in 1989. Huizenga's arguments are standard physics, obtusely applied. I.e., again and again Huizenga assumes that what cold fusion would be, if it is real, ordinary deuterium fusion, which is probably impossible. So not only can one derive from this book much of the history, one can also see the thought process of a major cold fusion skeptic. Look for the second edition, because it includes crucial material on heat/helium. --Abd (discusscontribs) 23:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Bart Simon, Science Studies and the Afterlife of Cold Fusion, Rutgers University Press, 2002.
Simon is a sociologist of science, and examines cold fusion as an example of the formation of "scientific consensus" that may not be a genuine "scientific consensus," i.e., based on the scientific method, but a social phenomenon. --Abd (discusscontribs) 23:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Charles G. Beaudette, Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed, Oak Grove Press, 2002.
Self published by a retired electrical engineer who observed the quality of work being done by cold fusion researchers, and who then collected historical and other material. With a foreword by Arthur C. Clarke, the book is accurate and reasonably thorough. --Abd (discusscontribs) 23:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

/Cincinnati Group[edit]

The subpage will study the history of the Cincinatti Group, which in 1997 announced the availability of a Low Energy Nuclear Transmutation Kit, designed and reported to transmute thorium into lighter elements. There was enthusiastic reception in some circles. What happened? They seem to have disappeared, the principals died, with some suspicion that it was from radiation poisoning. Was there artifact, fraud, or does this remain a mystery?