Flagged Revisions installed. Unapproved pages display a Red unchecked notice under the title. Trolls attack here by creating and archiving pages with offensive content. To verify an archived page, check the original URL. Questions about administration? Contact User talk:Abd. Limited privacy on this site, see CFC:Limited privacy
|Please share your thoughts about whether to keep this resource or not. Resources are likely to remain at Wikiversity when you boldly address reasonable concerns through concrete improvements. We encourage you to give resources a chance to receive fair reviews and concrete improvements by keeping nomination notices intact.|
Rhine (1940/1966). ESP After Sixty Years.
Rhine & Pratt (1954). A review of the Pearce-Pratt distance series of ESP tests.
Pratt & Woodruff (1939). Size of stimulus symbols in extrasensory perception.
Hansel (1961). A Critical Analysis of the Pearce-Pratt Experiment.
Hansel (1961). A Critical Analysis of the Pratt-Woodruff Experiment.
Rhine & Pratt (1961). A Reply to the Hansel Critique of the Pearce-Pratt series.
Pratt & Woodruff (1961). Refutation of Hansel's allegation concerning the Pratt-Woodruff Series.
Honorton (1967). ESP: A Scientific Evaluation, C.E.M. Hansel, Review.
Pratt (1976). New Evidence supporting the ESP Interpretation of the Pratt-Woodruff experiment.
Honorton (1975). Error Some Place!
see also: Hansel (1980). ESP and Parapsychology: A Critical Re-evaluation.
see also: Marcello Truzzi's commentary on the research of C.E.M. Hansel (Zetetic Scholar, 7, p. 5)
see also: Mauskopf & McVaugh (1980). The Elusive Science: Origins of Experimental Psychical Research.
see also: Zingrone (2006). From Text to Self: The Interplay of Criticism and Response in the History of Parapsychology.