Please discuss article content on Wikipedia itself, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sarah_Wilson_(journalist)…
I actually want to discuss your relentless re-editing of my page to portray me as anti-vax. This concerns me as very dangerous and essentially putting me up as a poster girl for their movement.Some academics have brought it to my attention that you are trolling me.
Not so. Please propose any change at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sarah_Wilson_(journalist)… so that many editors (the article has had 74 editors) can see & decide
I’d love to know, if you will indulge me, what is your motivation?
To help build a high-quality free encyclopedia. So any improvement would be welcome!
Surely you would be aware that commercial morning television is not necessarily the most accurate forum for original sourcing?
It depends – it would be the _most_ accurate for verbatim quotations for example. But there are many aspects to sourcing, and article content needs to be decided by consensus on Wikipedia itself …
By relentlessly working to associate me with the anti-vax movement, however, you provide the movement with oxygen and what would appear to be a supporter in the public eye. I clarified my position on my blog and you choose to delete it
You mistake the situtation. But really these discussions are pointless since the only way to improve the article is to work through the issues on Wikipedia. Once again, the place for this is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sarah_Wilson_(journalist)…
You hold the power while ever you are familiar with the forum. I have other work to do and can’t keep attending to defending myself against ppl with a relentless obsession with taking me down. Frankly I find the phenomenon intriguing.
Go get him