Subpage of anglo-pyramidologist/darryl-l-smith/
Subpages of this page:
- skeptic-in-user-name/ Yes, Brits may spell it “sceptic,” but British sceptics use “skeptic,” and this troll always spells it so.
- comments-from-the-target i.e., “XXX” a red herring planted by Skeptic from Britain
- wikipedia-user a recent commentator on Kendrick’s blog. This went on and on.
- impersonations and some study of comments and edit timing.
- comment-trolling searching for the alleged outing (before I actually outed SfB)
Collecting evidence on the “Skeptic from Britain” obvious Darryl L. Smith Wikipedia sock.
They will claim “there is no evidence,” and then they will claim that I will write “endless words.” In fact, what I write becomes long because I show evidence. I do not always provide links, but if anyone has a question about any assertion (anywhere on this blog) ask. If comments are not enabled on a page, link to the page in a comment on any page with comments enabled, which could include all posts (i.e, what can be seen from the main page, http://coldfusioncommunity.net).
If any page is confusing because too long, comment and ask for a summary. I read all comments. The first comment from a user (which may refer to the email address provided by the user, I’m not sure) must be approved, as an anti-spam measure, but subsequent comments, after one is approved, are automatically approved unless I actually ban the user, which I have never done. Trolls are skewered and served for lunch, not banned. Welcome! Come on over for lunch!
Baseless allegations against [XXX, name redacted]
There were accusations that SfB was [XXX], or [XXX]. (This libel was created by highly suspicious anonymous accounts in the middle of widespread outrage over the activities of SfB. This kind of diversionary tactic was used in the first AP incident I investigated. It is used to stir up enmity toward an enemy, in some cases, or in this case, to make their targets (which would be anyone considered “fringe” by them) look foolish.
(If [XXX] wants these mentions removed, he may comment here, giving a real email address (which will not be published) and I will contact him. The purpose here is to protect him from these false claims, not to increase harassment. But it will be his choice, I would anonymize the references where possible. We should discuss it. Note: he did so request, see comments on this page and on the subpage.)
I do not know [XXX] and have had no connection with him [as this was first written]. My purpose is, as it has long been, to expose deception and impersonation and the creation of conflict through lies.
This is general, not about [XXX]: when someone lies about another whose politics may be questionable, it’s still a lie, and we do not transform the world for the better by lying about anything, nor do we create “hope not hate” by hating anyone; in fact, hating racism, while understandable, is also not going to heal the wounds. Hatred itself is the enemy, and not to be hated, but understood . . . and transformed.
The trolling (or perhaps clueless in some cases) blog comments:
(some of these, since I pointed out the problems, have been deleted by the blog owners):